Actually, the err's on my side. A lot of the opinions I pick up are geared toward disdain for radio and circulation/popular music (not that that's wrong, it merely is). I just figured I'd stick my neck out for a moment and offer another side. It would have delved into a rant, but I realized that would be incredibly arrogant and silly of me.
Well, sillier than usual.
And you would think, given the overall strength of the album, they'd pick singles more carefully. The first one's fine/generic, and the second one will NEVER see casual radio play unless it's a rock station.
Warhols sounds very familiar. Need space on drive/money for sampling. ;_;
Re: CRUCIFY! CRUCIFY!
Date: 2004-05-07 08:29 pm (UTC)Well, sillier than usual.
And you would think, given the overall strength of the album, they'd pick singles more carefully. The first one's fine/generic, and the second one will NEVER see casual radio play unless it's a rock station.
Warhols sounds very familiar. Need space on drive/money for sampling. ;_;