Wait, what?

[loopychew]

ExCUSE me? Do mine eyes decieve me? People want BOOKS rated?!

While I can kind of understand it in visual/motion maybe even in audio media, the concept of suggesting age limits for BOOKS is blatantly ridiculous. Considering books are the most basic form of media around and literacy is fundamental to pretty much any educational foundation, the idea of trying to impose artificial limits on who can and can't read books is patently INSANE.

The only way this could have possibly been amusing would have been to watch people foaming at the mouth as the Bible got the equivalent of an R-rating, except you KNOW people would exempt the Bible from any sort of rating.

Comments

Re: *Sigh*

[lirazel.livejournal.com]

HAH, my experience along those lines came a bit later--eight, I think. There was a copy of Balzac's Droll Stories in the children's section of the library, mis-shelved there because someone thought the medieval-looking characters in the wood-cut end papers meant "fairy tales".

The very first story is about a courtesan named Imperia, who gets her paid protector (a cardinal) to leave all the fixings for a sumptuous feast behind him and leave unsatisfied. She then shares the feast, along with... other things... with a very handsome novice monk. The wood-cuts later in the book were also very interesting, and the extensions to my vocabulary quite useful in later life. Not a single "dirty" word in the whole 200+ pages, mind you, but the power of allusion was greatly evident.

No, I didn't tell the librarians. I mean, it was in the children's room and I was a child, right?

Re: *Sigh*

[ninjadebugger.livejournal.com]

No need to bother the adults with that silliness, they have better things to worry about.