Nice! Are you looking for comments? If not, ignore this, If so:
1. '20, november' could probably be the same font as the rest (still larger of course, but same typeface). The current font looks a bit weird.
2. Could the text be made to stand out more e.g. with a thicker white border?
3. The DDR logo looks a bit weird because it's kind of facing the wrong way, would be better on the left of the poster. Not sure if that's an option here, quite possibly not.
4. Asterisks as bullets look ok but you should move them down to centre them vertically with the (lower-case) text
1. Warpti pointed it out already, so. 2. Probably, yes. I didn't want to overdo it with the draft version. 3. Don't think so, but I can always distort the Tournament logo instead, so they're facing the same way? (Or opposite ways, too...) 4. Mm, forgot about that. Will handle.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-10 07:16 pm (UTC)1. '20, november' could probably be the same font as the rest (still larger of course, but same typeface). The current font looks a bit weird.
2. Could the text be made to stand out more e.g. with a thicker white border?
3. The DDR logo looks a bit weird because it's kind of facing the wrong way, would be better on the left of the poster. Not sure if that's an option here, quite possibly not.
4. Asterisks as bullets look ok but you should move them down to centre them vertically with the (lower-case) text
no subject
Date: 2004-10-11 02:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-11 10:07 am (UTC)(The only significant difference as far as I can tell is in the V. Everything else is pretty much spot-on.)
no subject
Date: 2004-10-11 10:10 am (UTC)2. Probably, yes. I didn't want to overdo it with the draft version.
3. Don't think so, but I can always distort the Tournament logo instead, so they're facing the same way? (Or opposite ways, too...)
4. Mm, forgot about that. Will handle.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-12 09:03 pm (UTC)As for #3, nah, probably leave the tournament logo alone, it's not that bad. Just looks a bit freaky. :)
--quen